ghsa-h6p5-jr3p-xjfg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-05-09 09:33
Modified
2025-05-09 09:33
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ovl: don't allow datadir only
In theory overlayfs could support upper layer directly referring to a data layer, but there's no current use case for this.
Originally, when data-only layers were introduced, this wasn't allowed, only introduced by the "datadir+" feature, but without actually handling this case, resulting in an Oops.
Fix by disallowing datadir without lowerdir.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-37863" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-09T07:16:07Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\novl: don\u0027t allow datadir only\n\nIn theory overlayfs could support upper layer directly referring to a data\nlayer, but there\u0027s no current use case for this.\n\nOriginally, when data-only layers were introduced, this wasn\u0027t allowed,\nonly introduced by the \"datadir+\" feature, but without actually handling\nthis case, resulting in an Oops.\n\nFix by disallowing datadir without lowerdir.", "id": "GHSA-h6p5-jr3p-xjfg", "modified": "2025-05-09T09:33:20Z", "published": "2025-05-09T09:33:19Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37863" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0874b629f65320778e7e3e206177770666d9db18" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/21d2ffb0e9838a175064c22f3a9de97d1f56f27d" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9e3579213ba648fa23f780e8d53e99011c62331" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb3a04a8516ee9b5174379306f94279fc90424c4" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…