ghsa-hh94-frj2-pf9r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-21 15:31
Modified
2024-07-03 18:42
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ethtool: strset: fix message length calculation

Outer nest for ETHTOOL_A_STRSET_STRINGSETS is not accounted for. This may result in ETHTOOL_MSG_STRSET_GET producing a warning like:

calculated message payload length (684) not sufficient
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 30967 at net/ethtool/netlink.c:369 ethnl_default_doit+0x87a/0xa20

and a splat.

As usually with such warnings three conditions must be met for the warning to trigger: - there must be no skb size rounding up (e.g. reply_size of 684); - string set must be per-device (so that the header gets populated); - the device name must be at least 12 characters long.

all in all with current user space it looks like reading priv flags is the only place this could potentially happen. Or with syzbot :)

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-47241"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-266"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T15:15:13Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nethtool: strset: fix message length calculation\n\nOuter nest for ETHTOOL_A_STRSET_STRINGSETS is not accounted for.\nThis may result in ETHTOOL_MSG_STRSET_GET producing a warning like:\n\n    calculated message payload length (684) not sufficient\n    WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 30967 at net/ethtool/netlink.c:369 ethnl_default_doit+0x87a/0xa20\n\nand a splat.\n\nAs usually with such warnings three conditions must be met for the warning\nto trigger:\n - there must be no skb size rounding up (e.g. reply_size of 684);\n - string set must be per-device (so that the header gets populated);\n - the device name must be at least 12 characters long.\n\nall in all with current user space it looks like reading priv flags\nis the only place this could potentially happen. Or with syzbot :)",
  "id": "GHSA-hh94-frj2-pf9r",
  "modified": "2024-07-03T18:42:42Z",
  "published": "2024-05-21T15:31:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47241"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cfc7f0e70d649e6d2233fba0d9390b525677d971"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e175aef902697826d344ce3a12189329848fe898"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb3a948143688e14e2cfd2a2812877923d0e5e92"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.