ghsa-j23c-3429-q5qm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-05-20 18:30
Modified
2025-05-20 18:30
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu: Fix two issues in iommu_copy_struct_from_user()
In the review for iommu_copy_struct_to_user() helper, Matt pointed out that a NULL pointer should be rejected prior to dereferencing it: https://lore.kernel.org/all/86881827-8E2D-461C-BDA3-FA8FD14C343C@nvidia.com
And Alok pointed out a typo at the same time: https://lore.kernel.org/all/480536af-6830-43ce-a327-adbd13dc3f1d@oracle.com
Since both issues were copied from iommu_copy_struct_from_user(), fix them first in the current header.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-37900" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-20T16:15:26Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommu: Fix two issues in iommu_copy_struct_from_user()\n\nIn the review for iommu_copy_struct_to_user() helper, Matt pointed out that\na NULL pointer should be rejected prior to dereferencing it:\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/all/86881827-8E2D-461C-BDA3-FA8FD14C343C@nvidia.com\n\nAnd Alok pointed out a typo at the same time:\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/all/480536af-6830-43ce-a327-adbd13dc3f1d@oracle.com\n\nSince both issues were copied from iommu_copy_struct_from_user(), fix them\nfirst in the current header.", "id": "GHSA-j23c-3429-q5qm", "modified": "2025-05-20T18:30:54Z", "published": "2025-05-20T18:30:54Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37900" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e303d010722787dc84d94f68d70fe10dfc1b9ea" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/30a3f2f3e4bd6335b727c83c08a982d969752bc1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/967d6f0d9a20a1bf15ee7ed881e2d4e532e22709" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…