ghsa-j343-3qch-m53h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:20
Modified
2025-04-20 03:34
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock function in elf_getdata.c in elfutils before 0.168 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) sh_off or (2) sh_size ELF header value, which triggers a memory allocation failure.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-10255" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-03-23T16:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock function in elf_getdata.c in elfutils before 0.168 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) sh_off or (2) sh_size ELF header value, which triggers a memory allocation failure.", "id": "GHSA-j343-3qch-m53h", "modified": "2025-04-20T03:34:38Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:20:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10255" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/04/elfutils-memory-allocation-failure-in-__libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock-elf_getdata-c" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387584" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/elfutils-devel%40lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/Q4LE47FPEVRZANMV6JE2NMHYO4H5MHGJ" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/Q4LE47FPEVRZANMV6JE2NMHYO4H5MHGJ" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3670-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/03/22/1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…