ghsa-j3vp-xqjf-c8pj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:02
Modified
2022-05-13 01:02
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Little Snitch versions 4.0 to 4.0.6 use the SecStaticCodeCheckValidityWithErrors() function without the kSecCSCheckAllArchitectures flag and therefore do not validate all architectures stored in a fat binary. An attacker can maliciously craft a fat binary containing multiple architectures that may cause a situation where Little Snitch treats the running process as having no code signature at all while erroneously indicating that the binary on disk does have a valid code signature. This could lead to users being confused about whether or not the code signature is valid.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-10470" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-347" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-06-12T17:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Little Snitch versions 4.0 to 4.0.6 use the SecStaticCodeCheckValidityWithErrors() function without the kSecCSCheckAllArchitectures flag and therefore do not validate all architectures stored in a fat binary. An attacker can maliciously craft a fat binary containing multiple architectures that may cause a situation where Little Snitch treats the running process as having no code signature at all while erroneously indicating that the binary on disk does have a valid code signature. This could lead to users being confused about whether or not the code signature is valid.", "id": "GHSA-j3vp-xqjf-c8pj", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:02:17Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:02:17Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-10470" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://obdev.at/cve/2018-10470-8FRWkW4oH8.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.okta.com/security-blog/2018/06/issues-around-third-party-apple-code-signing-checks" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…