ghsa-m54h-5x5f-5m6r
Vulnerability from github
Impact
Any user making a negative authorization decision based on the results of a LookupResources request with 1.22.0 is affected.
For example, using LookupResources
to find a list of resources to allow access to be okay: some subjects that should have access to a resource may not. But if using LookupResources
to find a list of banned resources instead, then some users that shouldn't have access may.
Generally, LookupResources
is not and should not be used to gate access in this way - that's what the Check
API is for. Additionally, version 1.22.0 has included a warning about this bug since its initial release.
Workarounds
Avoid using LookupResources
for negative authorization decisions if using 1.22.0
.
Patches
The only affected release is v1.22.0, and it is patched in v1.22.2 (there is no v1.22.1 release, though there is a git tag).
References
- https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/1397
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in SpiceDB * Ask a question in the SpiceDB Discord
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Go", "name": "github.com/authzed/spicedb" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "1.22.0" }, { "fixed": "1.22.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "1.22.0" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-35930" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-913" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-06-28T22:48:50Z", "nvd_published_at": "2023-06-26T20:15:10Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "### Impact\nAny user making a negative authorization decision based on the results of a LookupResources request with 1.22.0 is affected.\n\nFor example, using `LookupResources` to find a list of resources to allow access to be okay: some subjects that should have access to a resource may not. But if using `LookupResources` to find a list of banned resources instead, then some users that shouldn\u0027t have access may.\n\nGenerally, `LookupResources` is not and should not be used to gate access in this way - that\u0027s what the `Check` API is for. Additionally, version 1.22.0 has included a warning about this bug since its initial release.\n\n### Workarounds\nAvoid using `LookupResources` for negative authorization decisions if using `1.22.0`. \n\n### Patches\nThe only affected release is [v1.22.0](https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.22.0), and it is patched in [v1.22.2](https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.22.2) (there is no v1.22.1 release, though there is a git tag).\n\n### References\n- https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/1397\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [SpiceDB](https://github.com/authzed/spicedb)\n* Ask a question in the [SpiceDB Discord](https://authzed.com/discord)\n", "id": "GHSA-m54h-5x5f-5m6r", "modified": "2023-06-30T20:25:41Z", "published": "2023-06-28T22:48:50Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advisories/GHSA-m54h-5x5f-5m6r" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-35930" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/1397" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.22.2" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "SpiceDB\u0027s LookupResources may return partial results" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.