ghsa-m5m3-46gj-wch8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-10-06 19:54
Modified
2023-01-10 16:09
Severity ?
6.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
SIF's Digital Signature Hash Algorithms Not Validated
Details

Impact

The github.com/sylabs/sif/v2/pkg/integrity package does not verify that the hash algorithm(s) used are cryptographically secure when verifying digital signatures.

Patches

A patch is available in version >= v2.8.1 of the module. Users are encouraged to upgrade.

The patch is commit https://github.com/sylabs/sif/commit/07fb86029a12e3210f6131e065570124605daeaa

Workarounds

Users may independently validate that the hash algorithm(s) used for metadata digest(s) and signature hash are cryptographically secure.

References

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/sylabs/sif/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.8.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-39237"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-327",
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-06T19:54:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-10-06T18:16:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nThe `github.com/sylabs/sif/v2/pkg/integrity` package does not verify that the hash algorithm(s) used are cryptographically secure when verifying digital signatures.\n\n### Patches\n\nA patch is available in version \u003e= v2.8.1 of the module. Users are encouraged to upgrade.\n\nThe patch is commit https://github.com/sylabs/sif/commit/07fb86029a12e3210f6131e065570124605daeaa\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUsers may independently validate that the hash algorithm(s) used for metadata digest(s) and signature hash are cryptographically secure.\n\n### References\n\n* [CVE-2004-2761](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2004-2761)\n* [CVE-2005-4900](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2005-4900)\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Open an issue in [github.com/sylabs/sif](https://github.com/sylabs/sif/issues/new)\n* Email us at [security@sylabs.io](mailto:security@sylabs.io)",
  "id": "GHSA-m5m3-46gj-wch8",
  "modified": "2023-01-10T16:09:12Z",
  "published": "2022-10-06T19:54:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sylabs/sif/security/advisories/GHSA-m5m3-46gj-wch8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39237"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sylabs/sif/commit/07fb86029a12e3210f6131e065570124605daeaa"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/sylabs/sif"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sylabs/sif/releases/tag/v2.8.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2004-2761"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2005-4900"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2022-1045"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-19"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "SIF\u0027s Digital Signature Hash Algorithms Not Validated"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.