ghsa-m8gw-x5jx-r3vm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:15
Modified
2025-04-12 12:59
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
crypto/rsa/rsa_gen.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.6 mishandles C bitwise-shift operations that exceed the size of an expression, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging improper RSA key generation on 64-bit HP-UX platforms.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2000-1254"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-05-05T01:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "crypto/rsa/rsa_gen.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.6 mishandles C bitwise-shift operations that exceed the size of an expression, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging improper RSA key generation on 64-bit HP-UX platforms.",
"id": "GHSA-m8gw-x5jx-r3vm",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:59:26Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:15:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2000-1254"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=db82b8f9bd432a59aea8e1014694e15fc457c2bb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=db82b8f9bd432a59aea8e1014694e15fc457c2bb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=openssl-users\u0026m=95961024500509"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/04/17"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/90109"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035750"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…