ghsa-mv4p-vmf8-27c9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-12-27 15:31
Modified
2024-12-27 15:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/smc: initialize close_work early to avoid warning

We encountered a warning that close_work was canceled before initialization.

WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 111103 at kernel/workqueue.c:3047 __flush_work+0x19e/0x1b0 Workqueue: events smc_lgr_terminate_work [smc] RIP: 0010:__flush_work+0x19e/0x1b0 Call Trace: ? __wake_up_common+0x7a/0x190 ? work_busy+0x80/0x80 __cancel_work_timer+0xe3/0x160 smc_close_cancel_work+0x1a/0x70 [smc] smc_close_active_abort+0x207/0x360 [smc] __smc_lgr_terminate.part.38+0xc8/0x180 [smc] process_one_work+0x19e/0x340 worker_thread+0x30/0x370 ? process_one_work+0x340/0x340 kthread+0x117/0x130 ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x50/0x50 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

This is because when smc_close_cancel_work is triggered, e.g. the RDMA driver is rmmod and the LGR is terminated, the conn->close_work is flushed before initialization, resulting in WARN_ON(!work->func).

__smc_lgr_terminate | smc_connect_{rdma|ism}

                            | smc_conn_create
            | \- smc_lgr_register_conn

for conn in lgr->conns_all | - smc_conn_kill | - smc_close_active_abort | - smc_close_cancel_work | - cancel_work_sync | - __flush_work | (close_work) | | smc_close_init | - INIT_WORK(&close_work)

So fix this by initializing close_work before establishing the connection.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-56641"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-27T15:15:23Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/smc: initialize close_work early to avoid warning\n\nWe encountered a warning that close_work was canceled before\ninitialization.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 111103 at kernel/workqueue.c:3047 __flush_work+0x19e/0x1b0\n  Workqueue: events smc_lgr_terminate_work [smc]\n  RIP: 0010:__flush_work+0x19e/0x1b0\n  Call Trace:\n   ? __wake_up_common+0x7a/0x190\n   ? work_busy+0x80/0x80\n   __cancel_work_timer+0xe3/0x160\n   smc_close_cancel_work+0x1a/0x70 [smc]\n   smc_close_active_abort+0x207/0x360 [smc]\n   __smc_lgr_terminate.part.38+0xc8/0x180 [smc]\n   process_one_work+0x19e/0x340\n   worker_thread+0x30/0x370\n   ? process_one_work+0x340/0x340\n   kthread+0x117/0x130\n   ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x50/0x50\n   ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n\nThis is because when smc_close_cancel_work is triggered, e.g. the RDMA\ndriver is rmmod and the LGR is terminated, the conn-\u003eclose_work is\nflushed before initialization, resulting in WARN_ON(!work-\u003efunc).\n\n__smc_lgr_terminate             | smc_connect_{rdma|ism}\n-------------------------------------------------------------\n                                | smc_conn_create\n\t\t\t\t| \\- smc_lgr_register_conn\nfor conn in lgr-\u003econns_all      |\n\\- smc_conn_kill                |\n   \\- smc_close_active_abort    |\n      \\- smc_close_cancel_work  |\n         \\- cancel_work_sync    |\n            \\- __flush_work     |\n\t         (close_work)   |\n\t                        | smc_close_init\n\t                        | \\- INIT_WORK(\u0026close_work)\n\nSo fix this by initializing close_work before establishing the\nconnection.",
  "id": "GHSA-mv4p-vmf8-27c9",
  "modified": "2024-12-27T15:31:55Z",
  "published": "2024-12-27T15:31:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56641"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0541db8ee32c09463a72d0987382b3a3336b0043"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6638e52dcfafaf1b9cbc34544f0c832db0069ea1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0c37002210aaede10dae849d1a78efc2243add2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…