ghsa-p2cv-98qj-r2qc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-03-27 18:31
Modified
2025-04-14 21:32
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: Fix a buffer overflow in mgmt_mesh_add()
Smatch Warning: net/bluetooth/mgmt_util.c:375 mgmt_mesh_add() error: __memcpy() 'mesh_tx->param' too small (48 vs 50)
Analysis:
'mesh_tx->param' is array of size 48. This is the destination. u8 param[sizeof(struct mgmt_cp_mesh_send) + 29]; // 19 + 29 = 48.
But in the caller 'mesh_send' we reject only when len > 50. len > (MGMT_MESH_SEND_SIZE + 31) // 19 + 31 = 50.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-49754" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T17:15:40Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: Fix a buffer overflow in mgmt_mesh_add()\n\nSmatch Warning:\nnet/bluetooth/mgmt_util.c:375 mgmt_mesh_add() error: __memcpy()\n\u0027mesh_tx-\u003eparam\u0027 too small (48 vs 50)\n\nAnalysis:\n\n\u0027mesh_tx-\u003eparam\u0027 is array of size 48. This is the destination.\nu8 param[sizeof(struct mgmt_cp_mesh_send) + 29]; // 19 + 29 = 48.\n\nBut in the caller \u0027mesh_send\u0027 we reject only when len \u003e 50.\nlen \u003e (MGMT_MESH_SEND_SIZE + 31) // 19 + 31 = 50.", "id": "GHSA-p2cv-98qj-r2qc", "modified": "2025-04-14T21:32:23Z", "published": "2025-03-27T18:31:24Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49754" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2185e0fdbb2137f22a9dd9fcbf6481400d56299b" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed818fd8c531abf561b379995ee7cc4c68029464" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…