ghsa-p332-fw36-4hqx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:23
Modified
2025-04-12 02:59
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Caucho Quercus, as distributed in Resin, does not properly handle unspecified characters in the names of variables
Details
Caucho Quercus, as distributed in Resin before 4.0.29, does not properly handle unspecified characters in the names of variables, which has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, related to an "HTTP Parameter Contamination" issue.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "com.caucho:resin" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "4.0.29" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-2965" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-12T02:59:39Z", "nvd_published_at": "2012-08-12T16:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Caucho Quercus, as distributed in Resin before 4.0.29, does not properly handle unspecified characters in the names of variables, which has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, related to an \"HTTP Parameter Contamination\" issue.", "id": "GHSA-p332-fw36-4hqx", "modified": "2025-04-12T02:59:39Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:23:56Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2965" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20131210160901/http://en.securitylab.ru:80/lab/PT-2012-05" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://caucho.com/resin-4.0/changes/changes.xtp" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://en.securitylab.ru/lab" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/309979" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U", "type": "CVSS_V4" } ], "summary": "Caucho Quercus, as distributed in Resin, does not properly handle unspecified characters in the names of variables" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…