ghsa-p38p-vq33-v625
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:28
Modified
2025-04-03 04:23
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in bogofilter 0.96.2, 0.95.2, 0.94.14, 0.94.12, and other versions from 0.93.5 to 0.96.2, when using Unicode databases, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via "invalid input sequences" that lead to heap corruption when bogofilter or bogolexer converts character sets.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-4591" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-12-31T05:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in bogofilter 0.96.2, 0.95.2, 0.94.14, 0.94.12, and other versions from 0.93.5 to 0.96.2, when using Unicode databases, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via \"invalid input sequences\" that lead to heap corruption when bogofilter or bogolexer converts character sets.", "id": "GHSA-p38p-vq33-v625", "modified": "2025-04-03T04:23:30Z", "published": "2022-05-01T02:28:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-4591" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24118" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/240-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/security/bogofilter-SA-2005-01" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-Feb/0001.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18352" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18427" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18717" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16171" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0100" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…