ghsa-p54p-8qp2-pc9m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-04-16 15:34
Modified
2025-04-16 15:34
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: fix r_count dec/increment mismatch

r_count is only increased when there is an oplock break wait, so r_count inc/decrement are not paired. This can cause r_count to become negative, which can lead to a problem where the ksmbd thread does not terminate.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-22074"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:16:01Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix r_count dec/increment mismatch\n\nr_count is only increased when there is an oplock break wait,\nso r_count inc/decrement are not paired. This can cause r_count\nto become negative, which can lead to a problem where the ksmbd\nthread does not terminate.",
  "id": "GHSA-p54p-8qp2-pc9m",
  "modified": "2025-04-16T15:34:43Z",
  "published": "2025-04-16T15:34:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22074"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20378cf48359f39dee0ef9b61470ebe77bd49c0d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/457db486203c90e10c3efc87fd45cc7000b1cd36"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4790bcb269e5d6d88200a67c54ae6d627332a3be"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2ec33d46b4d1c8085dab5d02e00b21f4f0fb8a9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddb7ea36ba7129c2ed107e2186591128618864e1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…