ghsa-p658-8693-mhvg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-10-07 07:23
Modified
2024-05-31 16:54
Summary
Tendermint Core vulnerable to Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Details

Description

Tendermint Core v0.34.0 introduced a new way of handling evidence of misbehavior. As part of this, we added a new Timestamp field to Evidence structs. This timestamp would be calculated using the same algorithm that is used when a block is created and proposed. (This algorithm relies on the timestamp of the last commit from this specific block.)

In Tendermint Core v0.34.0-v0.34.2, the consensus reactor is responsible for forming DuplicateVoteEvidence whenever double signs are observed. However, the current block is still “in flight” when it is being formed by the consensus reactor. It hasn’t been finalized through network consensus yet. This means that different nodes in the network may observe different “last commits” when assigning a timestamp to DuplicateVoteEvidence.

In turn, different nodes could form DuplicateVoteEvidence objects at the same height but with different timestamps. One DuplicateVoteEvidence object (with one timestamp) will then eventually get finalized in the block, but this means that any DuplicateVoteEvidence with a different timestamp is considered invalid. Any node that formed invalid DuplicateVoteEvidence will continue to propose invalid evidence; its peers may see this, and choose to disconnect from this node. This bug means that double signs are DoS vectors in Tendermint Core v0.34.0-v0.34.2.

Tendermint Core v0.34.3 is a security release which fixes this bug. As of v0.34.3, DuplicateVoteEvidence is no longer formed by the consensus reactor; rather, the consensus reactor passes the Votes themselves into the EvidencePool, which is now responsible for forming DuplicateVoteEvidence. The EvidencePool has timestamp info that should be consistent across the network, which means that DuplicateVoteEvidence formed in this reactor should have consistent timestamps.

This release changes the API between the consensus and evidence reactors.

Impact

This is a denial-of-service vector which impacts networks running Tendermint Core v0.34.0 - v0.34.2.

Remediation

This problem has been patched in Tendermint Core v0.34.3. Networks running impacted versions of Tendermint Core should update immediately.

Workarounds

There are no workarounds, other than upgrading to a patched version of Tendermint Core.

Credits

  • Crypto.com (@cyril-crypto, @brianatcrypto, @tomtau and @yihuang) for finding and submitting this vulnerability
  • @melekes and @cmwaters for identifying the root cause and patching the problem

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in tendermint/tendermint * Email us at security@tendermint.com

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/tendermint/tendermint"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.34.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.34.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-21271"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-07T07:23:51Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Description \n\nTendermint Core v0.34.0 introduced a new way of handling evidence of misbehavior. As part of this, [we added a new `Timestamp` field to `Evidence` structs](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/5219). This timestamp would be calculated using the same algorithm that is used when a block is created and proposed. (This algorithm relies on the timestamp of the last commit from this specific block.) \n\nIn Tendermint Core v0.34.0-v0.34.2, the `consensus` reactor is responsible for forming `DuplicateVoteEvidence` whenever double signs are observed. However, the current block is still \u201cin flight\u201d when it is being formed by the `consensus` reactor. It hasn\u2019t been finalized through network consensus yet. This means that different nodes in the network may observe different \u201clast commits\u201d when assigning a timestamp to `DuplicateVoteEvidence.`\n\nIn turn, different nodes could form `DuplicateVoteEvidence` objects at the same height but with different timestamps. One `DuplicateVoteEvidence` object (with one timestamp) will then eventually get finalized in the block, but this means that any `DuplicateVoteEvidence` with a different timestamp is considered invalid. Any node that formed invalid `DuplicateVoteEvidence` will continue to propose invalid evidence; its peers may see this, and choose to disconnect from this node. This bug means that double signs are DoS vectors in Tendermint Core v0.34.0-v0.34.2. \n\nTendermint Core v0.34.3 is a security release which fixes this bug. As of v0.34.3, `DuplicateVoteEvidence` is no longer formed by the `consensus` reactor; rather, the `consensus` reactor passes the `Vote`s themselves into the `EvidencePool`, which is now responsible for forming `DuplicateVoteEvidence`. The `EvidencePool` has timestamp info that should be consistent across the network, which means that `DuplicateVoteEvidence` formed in this reactor should have consistent timestamps. \n\nThis release changes the API between the `consensus` and `evidence` reactors. \n\n### Impact\n\nThis is a denial-of-service vector which impacts networks running Tendermint Core v0.34.0 - v0.34.2.\n\n### Remediation\n\nThis problem has been patched in Tendermint Core v0.34.3. Networks running impacted versions of Tendermint Core should update immediately.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no workarounds, other than upgrading to a patched version of Tendermint Core.\n\n### Credits \n\n* Crypto.com (@cyril-crypto, @brianatcrypto, @tomtau and  @yihuang) for finding and submitting this vulnerability\n* @melekes and @cmwaters for identifying the root cause and patching the problem \n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [tendermint/tendermint](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint)\n* Email us at [security@tendermint.com](mailto:security@tendermint.com)",
  "id": "GHSA-p658-8693-mhvg",
  "modified": "2024-05-31T16:54:40Z",
  "published": "2022-10-07T07:23:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/security/advisories/GHSA-p658-8693-mhvg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21271"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/5219"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/commit/a2a6852ab99e4a0f9e79f0ea8c1726e262e25c76"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/blob/v0.34.3/CHANGELOG.md#v0.34.3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2022-1052"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Tendermint Core vulnerable to Uncontrolled Resource Consumption"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…