ghsa-p7f3-rfhj-89v7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-12-27 15:31
Modified
2024-12-27 15:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm device

Piergiorgio reported a bug in bugzilla as below:

------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 969 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:1330 RIP: 0010:__submit_discard_cmd+0x27d/0x400 [f2fs] Call Trace: __issue_discard_cmd+0x1ca/0x350 [f2fs] issue_discard_thread+0x191/0x480 [f2fs] kthread+0xcf/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

w/ below testcase, it can reproduce this bug quickly: - pvcreate /dev/vdb - vgcreate myvg1 /dev/vdb - lvcreate -L 1024m -n mylv1 myvg1 - mount /dev/myvg1/mylv1 /mnt/f2fs - dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/f2fs/file bs=1M count=20 - sync - rm /mnt/f2fs/file - sync - lvcreate -L 1024m -s -n mylv1-snapshot /dev/myvg1/mylv1 - umount /mnt/f2fs

The root cause is: it will update discard_max_bytes of mounted lvm device to zero after creating snapshot on this lvm device, then, __submit_discard_cmd() will pass parameter @nr_sects w/ zero value to __blkdev_issue_discard(), it returns a NULL bio pointer, result in panic.

This patch changes as below for fixing: 1. Let's drop all remained discards in f2fs_unfreeze() if snapshot of lvm device is created. 2. Checking discard_max_bytes before submitting discard during __submit_discard_cmd().

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-56565"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-27T15:15:15Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm device\n\nPiergiorgio reported a bug in bugzilla as below:\n\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 969 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:1330\nRIP: 0010:__submit_discard_cmd+0x27d/0x400 [f2fs]\nCall Trace:\n __issue_discard_cmd+0x1ca/0x350 [f2fs]\n issue_discard_thread+0x191/0x480 [f2fs]\n kthread+0xcf/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n\nw/ below testcase, it can reproduce this bug quickly:\n- pvcreate /dev/vdb\n- vgcreate myvg1 /dev/vdb\n- lvcreate -L 1024m -n mylv1 myvg1\n- mount /dev/myvg1/mylv1 /mnt/f2fs\n- dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/f2fs/file bs=1M count=20\n- sync\n- rm /mnt/f2fs/file\n- sync\n- lvcreate -L 1024m -s -n mylv1-snapshot /dev/myvg1/mylv1\n- umount /mnt/f2fs\n\nThe root cause is: it will update discard_max_bytes of mounted lvm\ndevice to zero after creating snapshot on this lvm device, then,\n__submit_discard_cmd() will pass parameter @nr_sects w/ zero value\nto __blkdev_issue_discard(), it returns a NULL bio pointer, result\nin panic.\n\nThis patch changes as below for fixing:\n1. Let\u0027s drop all remained discards in f2fs_unfreeze() if snapshot\nof lvm device is created.\n2. Checking discard_max_bytes before submitting discard during\n__submit_discard_cmd().",
  "id": "GHSA-p7f3-rfhj-89v7",
  "modified": "2024-12-27T15:31:54Z",
  "published": "2024-12-27T15:31:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56565"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15136c3861a3341db261ebdbb6ae4ae1765635e2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc8aeb04fd80cb8cfae3058445c84410fd0beb5e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed24ab98242f8d22b66fbe0452c97751b5ea4e22"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…