ghsa-pvgh-6wjg-x887
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:04
Modified
2022-05-17 03:04
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
programs/pluto/ikev1.c in libreswan before 3.17 retransmits in initial-responder states, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (traffic amplification) via a spoofed UDP packet. NOTE: the original behavior complies with the IKEv1 protocol, but has a required security update from the libreswan vendor; as of 2016-06-10, it is expected that several other IKEv1 implementations will have vendor-required security updates, with separate CVE IDs assigned to each.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-5361" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-06-16T14:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "programs/pluto/ikev1.c in libreswan before 3.17 retransmits in initial-responder states, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (traffic amplification) via a spoofed UDP packet. NOTE: the original behavior complies with the IKEv1 protocol, but has a required security update from the libreswan vendor; as of 2016-06-10, it is expected that several other IKEv1 implementations will have vendor-required security updates, with separate CVE IDs assigned to each.", "id": "GHSA-pvgh-6wjg-x887", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:04:55Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:04:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5361" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/libreswan/libreswan/commit/152d6d95632d8b9477c170f1de99bcd86d7fb1d6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan-dev/2016-March/001394.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2603.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/10/4" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…