ghsa-pwrf-jm93-99r3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-08-20 15:31
Modified
2025-08-20 15:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
There's a vulnerability in the libssh package where when a libssh consumer passes in an unexpectedly large input buffer to ssh_get_fingerprint_hash() function. In such cases the bin_to_base64() function can experience an integer overflow leading to a memory under allocation, when that happens it's possible that the program perform out of bounds write leading to a heap corruption. This issue affects only 32-bits builds of libssh.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-4877" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-20T13:15:28Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "There\u0027s a vulnerability in the libssh package where when a libssh consumer passes in an unexpectedly large input buffer to ssh_get_fingerprint_hash() function. In such cases the bin_to_base64() function can experience an integer overflow leading to a memory under allocation, when that happens it\u0027s possible that the program perform out of bounds write leading to a heap corruption.\nThis issue affects only 32-bits builds of libssh.", "id": "GHSA-pwrf-jm93-99r3", "modified": "2025-08-20T15:31:41Z", "published": "2025-08-20T15:31:41Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-4877" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4877" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2376193" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.libssh.org/projects/libssh.git/commit/?h=stable-0.11\u0026id=6fd9cc8ce3958092a1aae11f1f2e911b2747732d" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.libssh.org/security/advisories/CVE-2025-4877.txt" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…