ghsa-pxfc-8f3m-gmg5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 00:11
Modified
2022-05-02 00:11
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in adsmdll.dll 5.3.7.7296, as used by the daemon (dsmsvc.exe) in the backup server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Express 5.3.7.3 and earlier and TSM 5.2, 5.3 before 5.3.6.0, and 5.4.0.0 through 5.4.4.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted length value.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-4563" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-03-11T14:19:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in adsmdll.dll 5.3.7.7296, as used by the daemon (dsmsvc.exe) in the backup server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Express 5.3.7.3 and earlier and TSM 5.2, 5.3 before 5.3.6.0, and 5.4.0.0 through 5.4.4.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted length value.", "id": "GHSA-pxfc-8f3m-gmg5", "modified": "2022-05-02T00:11:21Z", "published": "2022-05-02T00:11:21Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4563" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/49188" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2009-03/0192.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=775" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/52617" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34245" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1021837" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21377388" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34077" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0669" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…