ghsa-q29f-crhg-mxh3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:36
Modified
2022-05-14 03:36
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The eap_pwd_process function in eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c in hostapd 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when used with (1) an internal EAP server or (2) a RADIUS server and EAP-pwd is enabled in a runtime configuration, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-5314" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-02-21T16:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The eap_pwd_process function in eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c in hostapd 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when used with (1) an internal EAP server or (2) a RADIUS server and EAP-pwd is enabled in a runtime configuration, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message.", "id": "GHSA-q29f-crhg-mxh3", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:36:23Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:36:23Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5314" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…