ghsa-q354-p7j8-f3fx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:57
Modified
2022-05-01 23:57
VLAI Severity ?
Details
dnsmasq 2.25 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) by (1) renewing a nonexistent lease or (2) sending a DHCPREQUEST for an IP address that is not in the same network, related to the DHCP NAK response from the daemon.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-3214" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-07-18T16:41:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "dnsmasq 2.25 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) by (1) renewing a nonexistent lease or (2) sending a DHCPREQUEST for an IP address that is not in the same network, related to the DHCP NAK response from the daemon.", "id": "GHSA-q354-p7j8-f3fx", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:57:52Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:57:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3214" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/47438" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43929" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://freshmeat.net/projects/dnsmasq/?branch_id=1991\u0026release_id=217681" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/06/30/7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/01/8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/02/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/03/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/08/8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/12/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/CHANGELOG" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…