ghsa-q4p2-hx8c-p7gh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:22
Modified
2025-04-09 04:09
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2000 SP3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large amount of data associated with unspecified atoms in a PowerPoint file that triggers memory corruption, aka "Data Out of Bounds Vulnerability."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-1131" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-05-12T22:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2000 SP3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large amount of data associated with unspecified atoms in a PowerPoint file that triggers memory corruption, aka \"Data Out of Bounds Vulnerability.\"", "id": "GHSA-q4p2-hx8c-p7gh", "modified": "2025-04-09T04:09:44Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:22:02Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1131" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-017" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5351" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/54393" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32428" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2008-46" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503451" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34841" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022205" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-132A.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1290" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…