ghsa-r65m-rpw4-4w3f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:51
Modified
2022-05-02 03:51
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The StartServiceCtrlDispatcher function in the cvpnd service (cvpnd.exe) in Cisco VPN client for Windows before 5.0.06.0100 does not properly handle an ERROR_FAILED_SERVICE_CONTROLLER_CONNECT error, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (service crash and VPN connection loss) via a manual start of cvpnd.exe while the cvpnd service is running.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-4118" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-12-01T00:30:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "The StartServiceCtrlDispatcher function in the cvpnd service (cvpnd.exe) in Cisco VPN client for Windows before 5.0.06.0100 does not properly handle an ERROR_FAILED_SERVICE_CONTROLLER_CONNECT error, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (service crash and VPN connection loss) via a manual start of cvpnd.exe while the cvpnd service is running.", "id": "GHSA-r65m-rpw4-4w3f", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:51:52Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:51:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4118" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/0911-exploits/sybsec-adv17.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37419" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=19445" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37077" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3296" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…