ghsa-r6j9-mc43-m5jw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:20
Modified
2022-05-01 02:20
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in Kaspersky Anti-Virus Engine, as used in Kaspersky Personal 5.0.227, Anti-Virus On-Demand Scanner for Linux 5.0.5, and F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux 4.50 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted CHM file.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-3664"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-11-18T06:04:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in Kaspersky Anti-Virus Engine, as used in Kaspersky Personal 5.0.227, Anti-Virus On-Demand Scanner for Linux 5.0.5, and F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux 4.50 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted CHM file.",
  "id": "GHSA-r6j9-mc43-m5jw",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:20:01Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:20:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3664"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/22564"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17144"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=318\u0026type=vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/19912"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/19913"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15054"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…