ghsa-r6xp-mggj-7jq8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:41
Modified
2022-05-17 04:41
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Huawei Campus Series Switches S3700HI, S5700, S6700, S3300HI, S5300, S6300, S9300, S7700, and LSW S9700 with software V200R001 before V200R001SPH013; S5700, S6700, S5300, and S6300 with software V200R002 before V200R002SPH005; S7700, S9300, S9300E, S5300, S5700, S6300, S6700, S2350, S2750, and LSW S9700 with software V200R003 before V200R003SPH005; and S7700, S9300, S9300E, and LSW S9700 with software V200R005 before V200R005C00SPC300 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device restart) via a crafted length field in a packet.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-4190" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-06-17T14:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Huawei Campus Series Switches S3700HI, S5700, S6700, S3300HI, S5300, S6300, S9300, S7700, and LSW S9700 with software V200R001 before V200R001SPH013; S5700, S6700, S5300, and S6300 with software V200R002 before V200R002SPH005; S7700, S9300, S9300E, S5300, S5700, S6300, S6700, S2350, S2750, and LSW S9700 with software V200R003 before V200R003SPH005; and S7700, S9300, S9300E, and LSW S9700 with software V200R005 before V200R005C00SPC300 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device restart) via a crafted length field in a packet.", "id": "GHSA-r6xp-mggj-7jq8", "modified": "2022-05-17T04:41:53Z", "published": "2022-05-17T04:41:53Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-4190" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.huawei.com/en/security/psirt/security-bulletins/security-advisories/hw-343218.htm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/67907" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…