ghsa-r924-qqrh-r39v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:18
Modified
2022-05-03 03:18
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in the ISO network protocol support in the NetBSD kernel 2.0 through 4.0_BETA2, and NetBSD-current before 20070329, allow local users to execute arbitrary code via long parameters to certain functions, as demonstrated by a long sockaddr structure argument to the clnp_route function.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-1677"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-03-30T00:19:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in the ISO network protocol support in the NetBSD kernel 2.0 through 4.0_BETA2, and NetBSD-current before 20070329, allow local users to execute arbitrary code via long parameters to certain functions, as demonstrated by a long sockaddr structure argument to the clnp_route function.",
  "id": "GHSA-r924-qqrh-r39v",
  "modified": "2022-05-03T03:18:07Z",
  "published": "2022-05-03T03:18:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1677"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33381"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/43596"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23193"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017832"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1159"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…