github - ghsa-rf64-vpcw-m8c6

ghsa-rf64-vpcw-m8c6

Vulnerability from github

Published

2022-04-29 02:57

Modified

2022-04-29 02:57

Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in Exim 3.35, and other versions before 4, when the sender_verify option is true, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code during sender verification.

Show details on source website

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0399"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-07-07T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Exim 3.35, and other versions before 4, when the sender_verify option is true, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code during sender verification.",
  "id": "GHSA-rf64-vpcw-m8c6",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:57:40Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:57:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0399"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16079"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/021015.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11558"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-501"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-502"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.guninski.com/exim1.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

CVE-2004-0399 (GCVE-0-2004-0399)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2004-05-12 04:00

Modified

2024-08-08 00:17

Severity ?

CWE

n/a

Summary

Stack-based buffer overflow in Exim 3.35, and other versions before 4, when the sender_verify option is true, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code during sender verification.

References

►

URL

Tags

	http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-502	vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
	http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-501	vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
	http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/021015.html	mailing-list, x_refsource_FULLDISC
	http://secunia.com/advisories/11558	third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
	https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16079	vdb-entry, x_refsource_XF
	http://www.guninski.com/exim1.html	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	n/a	n/a	Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T00:17:14.639Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "DSA-502",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_DEBIAN",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-502"
          },
          {
            "name": "DSA-501",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_DEBIAN",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-501"
          },
          {
            "name": "20040506 Buffer overflows in exim, yet still exim much better than windows",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/021015.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "11558",
            "tags": [
              "third-party-advisory",
              "x_refsource_SECUNIA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11558"
          },
          {
            "name": "exim-requireverify-bo(16079)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16079"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.guninski.com/exim1.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2004-05-06T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Exim 3.35, and other versions before 4, when the sender_verify option is true, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code during sender verification."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-07-10T14:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "DSA-502",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_DEBIAN"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-502"
        },
        {
          "name": "DSA-501",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_DEBIAN"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-501"
        },
        {
          "name": "20040506 Buffer overflows in exim, yet still exim much better than windows",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_FULLDISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/021015.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "11558",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "x_refsource_SECUNIA"
          ],
          "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11558"
        },
        {
          "name": "exim-requireverify-bo(16079)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16079"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.guninski.com/exim1.html"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2004-0399",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Exim 3.35, and other versions before 4, when the sender_verify option is true, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code during sender verification."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "DSA-502",
              "refsource": "DEBIAN",
              "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-502"
            },
            {
              "name": "DSA-501",
              "refsource": "DEBIAN",
              "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-501"
            },
            {
              "name": "20040506 Buffer overflows in exim, yet still exim much better than windows",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/021015.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "11558",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11558"
            },
            {
              "name": "exim-requireverify-bo(16079)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16079"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.guninski.com/exim1.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.guninski.com/exim1.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2004-0399",
    "datePublished": "2004-05-12T04:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2004-04-13T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T00:17:14.639Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Tags

Taxonomy of the tags.

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.