ghsa-rg8f-w58v-jv6v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:18
Modified
2025-04-11 04:05
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The SSH USERAUTH CHANGE REQUEST feature in SSH Tectia Server 6.0.4 through 6.0.20, 6.1.0 through 6.1.12, 6.2.0 through 6.2.5, and 6.3.0 through 6.3.2 on UNIX and Linux, when old-style password authentication is enabled, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted session involving entry of blank passwords, as demonstrated by a root login session from a modified OpenSSH client with an added input_userauth_passwd_changereq call in sshconnect2.c.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-5975" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-287" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-12-04T23:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The SSH USERAUTH CHANGE REQUEST feature in SSH Tectia Server 6.0.4 through 6.0.20, 6.1.0 through 6.1.12, 6.2.0 through 6.2.5, and 6.3.0 through 6.3.2 on UNIX and Linux, when old-style password authentication is enabled, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted session involving entry of blank passwords, as demonstrated by a root login session from a modified OpenSSH client with an added input_userauth_passwd_changereq call in sshconnect2.c.", "id": "GHSA-rg8f-w58v-jv6v", "modified": "2025-04-11T04:05:29Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:18:16Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5975" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/modules/exploits/unix/ssh/tectia_passwd_changereq.rb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2012-12/0013.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2012-12/0065.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/23082" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…