ghsa-rxrj-c86x-c8c8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-02-13 18:32
Modified
2025-02-13 18:32
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
A CWE-598 “Use of GET Request Method with Sensitive Query Strings” was discovered affecting the 130.8005 TCP/IP Gateway running firmware version 12h. Both the SHA-1 hash of the password as well as the session tokens are included as part of the URL and therefore exposed to information leakage scenarios. An attacker capable of accessing such values (e.g., victim browser, network traffic inspection) can exploit this vulnerability to leak both the password hash as well as session tokens and bypass the authentication mechanism using a pass-the-hash attack.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-12012" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-598" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-13T16:15:43Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A CWE-598 \u201cUse of GET Request Method with Sensitive Query Strings\u201d was discovered affecting the 130.8005 TCP/IP Gateway running firmware version 12h. Both the SHA-1 hash of the password as well as the session tokens are included as part of the URL and therefore exposed to information leakage scenarios. An attacker capable of accessing such values (e.g., victim browser, network traffic inspection) can exploit this vulnerability to leak both the password hash as well as session tokens and bypass the authentication mechanism using a pass-the-hash attack.", "id": "GHSA-rxrj-c86x-c8c8", "modified": "2025-02-13T18:32:33Z", "published": "2025-02-13T18:32:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12012" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.nozominetworks.com/labs/vulnerability-advisories-cve-2024-12012" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…