ghsa-v52h-q97r-4w5h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:05
Modified
2022-05-01 18:05
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in Firebird 2.1 allow attackers to trigger memory corruption and possibly have other unspecified impact via certain input processed by (1) config\ConfigFile.cpp or (2) msgs\check_msgs.epp. NOTE: if ConfigFile.cpp reads a configuration file with restrictive permissions, then the ConfigFile.cpp vector may not cross privilege boundaries and perhaps should not be included in CVE.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-2606" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-05-11T10:19:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in Firebird 2.1 allow attackers to trigger memory corruption and possibly have other unspecified impact via certain input processed by (1) config\\ConfigFile.cpp or (2) msgs\\check_msgs.epp. NOTE: if ConfigFile.cpp reads a configuration file with restrictive permissions, then the ConfigFile.cpp vector may not cross privilege boundaries and perhaps should not be included in CVE.", "id": "GHSA-v52h-q97r-4w5h", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:05:15Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:05:15Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2606" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34201" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/37308" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/37309" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29501" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2708" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1529" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/468070/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28478" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…