github - ghsa-v7m9-pm9f-frqg

ghsa-v7m9-pm9f-frqg

Vulnerability from github

Published

2025-04-22 18:32

Modified

2025-04-23 15:30

Severity ?

7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Details

An issue in UPF in Open5GS UPF versions up to v2.7.2 results an assertion failure vulnerability in PFCP session parameter validation. When processing a PFCP Session Establishment Request with PDN Type=0, the UPF fails to handle the invalid value propagated from SMF (or via direct attack), triggering a fatal assertion check and causing a daemon crash.

Show details on source website

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-29339"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-617"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-22T17:16:46Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue in UPF in Open5GS UPF versions up to v2.7.2 results an assertion failure vulnerability in PFCP session parameter validation. When processing a PFCP Session Establishment Request with PDN Type=0, the UPF fails to handle the invalid value propagated from SMF (or via direct attack), triggering a fatal assertion check and causing a daemon crash.",
  "id": "GHSA-v7m9-pm9f-frqg",
  "modified": "2025-04-23T15:30:53Z",
  "published": "2025-04-22T18:32:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-29339"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/open5gs/open5gs/issues/3727"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

CVE-2025-29339 (GCVE-0-2025-29339)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2025-04-22 00:00

Modified

2025-04-23 13:36

Severity ?

7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CWE

n/a

Summary

An issue in UPF in Open5GS UPF versions up to v2.7.2 results an assertion failure vulnerability in PFCP session parameter validation. When processing a PFCP Session Establishment Request with PDN Type=0, the UPF fails to handle the invalid value propagated from SMF (or via direct attack), triggering a fatal assertion check and causing a daemon crash.

References

►

URL

Tags

https://github.com/open5gs/open5gs/issues/3727

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	n/a	n/a	Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 7.5,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-29339",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:35:27.528304Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-617",
                "description": "CWE-617 Reachable Assertion",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T13:36:39.811Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An issue in UPF in Open5GS UPF versions up to v2.7.2 results an assertion failure vulnerability in PFCP session parameter validation. When processing a PFCP Session Establishment Request with PDN Type=0, the UPF fails to handle the invalid value propagated from SMF (or via direct attack), triggering a fatal assertion check and causing a daemon crash."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-04-22T17:06:41.317Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/open5gs/open5gs/issues/3727"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-29339",
    "datePublished": "2025-04-22T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-03-11T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T13:36:39.811Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Tags

Taxonomy of the tags.

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.