ghsa-vqhj-2h3q-6ghm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:20
Modified
2022-04-30 18:20
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Buffer overflows in Fetchmail 6.0.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via (1) long headers that are not properly processed by the readheaders function, or (2) via long Received: headers, which are not properly parsed by the parse_received function.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2002-1174" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2002-10-11T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflows in Fetchmail 6.0.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via (1) long headers that are not properly processed by the readheaders function, or (2) via long Received: headers, which are not properly parsed by the parse_received function.", "id": "GHSA-vqhj-2h3q-6ghm", "modified": "2022-04-30T18:20:41Z", "published": "2022-04-30T18:20:41Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1174" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000531" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103340148625187\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-215.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-171" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10203.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2002/MDKSA-2002-063.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/other_advisory-2402.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5825" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5827" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…