ghsa-vvxc-jgjh-cjf4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:47
Modified
2022-05-17 03:47
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple integer overflows in the (1) pixops_composite_nearest, (2) pixops_composite_color_nearest, and (3) pixops_process functions in pixops/pixops.c in gdk-pixbuf before 2.33.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted image, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-8875" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-06-01T22:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple integer overflows in the (1) pixops_composite_nearest, (2) pixops_composite_color_nearest, and (3) pixops_process functions in pixops/pixops.c in gdk-pixbuf before 2.33.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted image, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-vvxc-jgjh-cjf4", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:47:57Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:47:57Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8875" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.gnome.org/browse/gdk-pixbuf/commit/?id=dbfe8f70471864818bf458a39c8a99640895bd22" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3589" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/12/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/16/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/17/7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3085-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…