ghsa-vxxg-j26r-33g8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:43
Modified
2022-05-17 05:43
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The AvahiDnsPacket function in avahi-core/socket.c in avahi-daemon in Avahi 0.6.16 and 0.6.25 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a DNS packet with an invalid checksum followed by a DNS packet with a valid checksum, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-5081.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-2244" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-07-08T12:54:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The AvahiDnsPacket function in avahi-core/socket.c in avahi-daemon in Avahi 0.6.16 and 0.6.25 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a DNS packet with an invalid checksum followed by a DNS packet with a valid checksum, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-5081.", "id": "GHSA-vxxg-j26r-33g8", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:43:19Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:43:19Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2244" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607293" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/043800.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/043820.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127748459505200\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2086" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:204" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/06/23/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024200" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…