ghsa-wfcx-25g8-9rvx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-07-09 12:31
Modified
2025-07-09 12:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Add sanity checks for drm_edid_raw()
When EDID is retrieved via drm_edid_raw(), it doesn't guarantee to return proper EDID bytes the caller wants: it may be either NULL (that leads to an Oops) or with too long bytes over the fixed size raw_edid array (that may lead to memory corruption). The latter was reported actually when connected with a bad adapter.
Add sanity checks for drm_edid_raw() to address the above corner cases, and return EDID_BAD_INPUT accordingly.
(cherry picked from commit 648d3f4d209725d51900d6a3ed46b7b600140cdf)
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-38254" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-09T11:15:27Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Add sanity checks for drm_edid_raw()\n\nWhen EDID is retrieved via drm_edid_raw(), it doesn\u0027t guarantee to\nreturn proper EDID bytes the caller wants: it may be either NULL (that\nleads to an Oops) or with too long bytes over the fixed size raw_edid\narray (that may lead to memory corruption). The latter was reported\nactually when connected with a bad adapter.\n\nAdd sanity checks for drm_edid_raw() to address the above corner\ncases, and return EDID_BAD_INPUT accordingly.\n\n(cherry picked from commit 648d3f4d209725d51900d6a3ed46b7b600140cdf)", "id": "GHSA-wfcx-25g8-9rvx", "modified": "2025-07-09T12:31:35Z", "published": "2025-07-09T12:31:35Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38254" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b63507d7cd243574753c6b91f68516d9103f1de" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6847b3b6e84ef37451c074e6a8db3fbd250c8dbf" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…