ghsa-wfpp-99hh-hj75
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-05-02 18:31
Modified
2025-05-02 18:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5: Fix steering rules cleanup

vport's mc, uc and multicast rules are not deleted in teardown path when EEH happens. Since the vport's promisc settings(uc, mc and all) in firmware are reset after EEH, mlx5 driver will try to delete the above rules in the initialization path. This cause kernel crash because these software rules are no longer valid.

Fix by nullifying these rules right after delete to avoid accessing any dangling pointers.

Call Trace: __list_del_entry_valid+0xcc/0x100 (unreliable) tree_put_node+0xf4/0x1b0 [mlx5_core] tree_remove_node+0x30/0x70 [mlx5_core] mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x14c/0x1f0 [mlx5_core] esw_apply_vport_rx_mode+0x10c/0x200 [mlx5_core] esw_update_vport_rx_mode+0xb4/0x180 [mlx5_core] esw_vport_change_handle_locked+0x1ec/0x230 [mlx5_core] esw_enable_vport+0x130/0x260 [mlx5_core] mlx5_eswitch_enable_sriov+0x2a0/0x2f0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_device_enable_sriov+0x74/0x440 [mlx5_core] mlx5_load_one+0x114c/0x1550 [mlx5_core] mlx5_pci_resume+0x68/0xf0 [mlx5_core] eeh_report_resume+0x1a4/0x230 eeh_pe_dev_traverse+0x98/0x170 eeh_handle_normal_event+0x3e4/0x640 eeh_handle_event+0x4c/0x370 eeh_event_handler+0x14c/0x210 kthread+0x168/0x1b0 ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x84

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-53079"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-02T16:15:26Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5: Fix steering rules cleanup\n\nvport\u0027s mc, uc and multicast rules are not deleted in teardown path when\nEEH happens. Since the vport\u0027s promisc settings(uc, mc and all) in\nfirmware are reset after EEH, mlx5 driver will try to delete the above\nrules in the initialization path. This cause kernel crash because these\nsoftware rules are no longer valid.\n\nFix by nullifying these rules right after delete to avoid accessing any dangling\npointers.\n\nCall Trace:\n__list_del_entry_valid+0xcc/0x100 (unreliable)\ntree_put_node+0xf4/0x1b0 [mlx5_core]\ntree_remove_node+0x30/0x70 [mlx5_core]\nmlx5_del_flow_rules+0x14c/0x1f0 [mlx5_core]\nesw_apply_vport_rx_mode+0x10c/0x200 [mlx5_core]\nesw_update_vport_rx_mode+0xb4/0x180 [mlx5_core]\nesw_vport_change_handle_locked+0x1ec/0x230 [mlx5_core]\nesw_enable_vport+0x130/0x260 [mlx5_core]\nmlx5_eswitch_enable_sriov+0x2a0/0x2f0 [mlx5_core]\nmlx5_device_enable_sriov+0x74/0x440 [mlx5_core]\nmlx5_load_one+0x114c/0x1550 [mlx5_core]\nmlx5_pci_resume+0x68/0xf0 [mlx5_core]\neeh_report_resume+0x1a4/0x230\neeh_pe_dev_traverse+0x98/0x170\neeh_handle_normal_event+0x3e4/0x640\neeh_handle_event+0x4c/0x370\neeh_event_handler+0x14c/0x210\nkthread+0x168/0x1b0\nret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x84",
  "id": "GHSA-wfpp-99hh-hj75",
  "modified": "2025-05-02T18:31:35Z",
  "published": "2025-05-02T18:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53079"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18cead61e437f4c7898acca0a5f3df12f801d97f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4df1f2d36bdc9a368650bf14b9097c555e95f71d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63546395a0e6ac264f78f65218086ce6014b4494"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f5780536181d1d0d09a11a1bc92f22e143447e2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/922f56e9a795d6f3dd72d3428ebdd7ee040fa855"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…