ghsa-wgqx-9hcf-wpvq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-04-16 15:34
Modified
2025-04-16 15:34
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath11k: add srng->lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode

ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng->lock to protect srng data.

For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(), they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng->lock.

So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur: RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] Call Trace: ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k] ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k] ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k] __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319

So add srng->lock for them to avoid such warnings.

Inorder to fetch the srng->lock, should change srng's definition from 'void' to 'struct hal_srng'. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().

Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30 Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-58096"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:15:53Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath11k: add srng-\u003elock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode\n\nath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-\u003elock to protect srng data.\n\nFor ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),\nthey use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-\u003elock.\n\nSo when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:\nRIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]\nCall Trace:\n ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]\n ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]\n ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0\n ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]\n ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]\n ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]\n __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0\n net_rx_action+0x198/0x320\n __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319\n\nSo add srng-\u003elock for them to avoid such warnings.\n\nInorder to fetch the srng-\u003elock, should change srng\u0027s definition from\n\u0027void\u0027 to \u0027struct hal_srng\u0027. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent\none line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring\nprocess functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().\n\nTested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30\nTested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1",
  "id": "GHSA-wgqx-9hcf-wpvq",
  "modified": "2025-04-16T15:34:38Z",
  "published": "2025-04-16T15:34:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58096"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63b7af49496d0e32f7a748b6af3361ec138b1bd3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b85758e76b6452740fc2a08ced6759af64c0d59a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…