ghsa-wm38-2p64-43v7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 16:56
Modified
2024-03-21 03:33
Details

A stack-based buffer overflow in the subtitle decoder in Libav 12.3 allows attackers to corrupt the stack via a crafted video file in Matroska format, because srt_to_ass in libavcodec/srtdec.c misuses snprintf.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-9719"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-120",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-09-19T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A stack-based buffer overflow in the subtitle decoder in Libav 12.3 allows attackers to corrupt the stack via a crafted video file in Matroska format, because srt_to_ass in libavcodec/srtdec.c misuses snprintf.",
  "id": "GHSA-wm38-2p64-43v7",
  "modified": "2024-03-21T03:33:41Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:56:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9719"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/libav/libav/blob/df744e3cf66548c9167ea857104a29d2ea92819e/libavcodec/srtdec.c#L113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/libav/libav/commits/master/libavcodec/srtdec.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lgtm.com/projects/g/libav/libav/snapshot/f5f553ca3bdca0c97dd08bbf002f0d8cb193788b/files/libavcodec/srtdec.c?sort=name\u0026dir=ASC\u0026mode=heatmap#xeec693aa6d85853b:1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lgtm.com/security"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…