ghsa-ww2m-6vp7-cp37
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:11
Modified
2025-04-03 04:16
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in University of Minnesota gopher client 3.0.9 allow remote malicious servers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long "+VIEWS:" reply, which is not properly handled in the VIfromLine function, and (2) certain arguments when launching third party programs such as a web browser from a web link, which is not properly handled in the FIOgetargv function.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-2772" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-09-02T23:03:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in University of Minnesota gopher client 3.0.9 allow remote malicious servers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long \"+VIEWS:\" reply, which is not properly handled in the VIfromLine function, and (2) certain arguments when launching third party programs such as a web browser from a web link, which is not properly handled in the FIOgetargv function.", "id": "GHSA-ww2m-6vp7-cp37", "modified": "2025-04-03T04:16:59Z", "published": "2022-05-01T02:11:36Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2772" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/22053" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112559902931614\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16614" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17016" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-832" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/619812" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14693" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…