ghsa-wx92-p8m2-phh4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:03
Modified
2022-05-14 02:03
Details

Buffer overflow in the listing module in Netwide Assembler (NASM) before 2.03.01 has unknown impact and attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2719.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-7177"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-09-08T10:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in the listing module in Netwide Assembler (NASM) before 2.03.01 has unknown impact and attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2719.",
  "id": "GHSA-wx92-p8m2-phh4",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:03:03Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:03:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-7177"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452800"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43441"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-June/msg01000.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30836"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=607497"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29955"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020378"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1939"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…