ghsa-x338-9gp2-578v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:13
Modified
2022-05-02 03:13
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The web interface for CUPS before 1.3.10 does not validate the HTTP Host header in a client request, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-0164" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-04-24T15:30:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The web interface for CUPS before 1.3.10 does not validate the HTTP Host header in a client request, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks.", "id": "GHSA-x338-9gp2-578v", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:13:16Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:13:16Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0164" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490597" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263070" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/May/msg00002.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35074" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200904-20.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3549" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2009-0061" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L582" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3118" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/502750/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34665" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-133A.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1297" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…