ghsa-x3jr-pf6g-c48f
Vulnerability from github
A message-forgery issue was discovered in crypto/openpgp/clearsign/clearsign.go
in supplementary Go cryptography libraries 2019-03-25. According to the OpenPGP Message Format specification in RFC 4880 chapter 7, a cleartext signed message can contain one or more optional "Hash" Armor Headers. The "Hash" Armor Header specifies the message digest algorithm(s) used for the signature. However, the Go clearsign package ignores the value of this header, which allows an attacker to spoof it. Consequently, an attacker can lead a victim to believe the signature was generated using a different message digest algorithm than what was actually used. Moreover, since the library skips Armor Header parsing in general, an attacker can not only embed arbitrary Armor Headers, but also prepend arbitrary text to cleartext messages without invalidating the signatures.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Go", "name": "golang.org/x/crypto" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "0.0.0-20190424203555-c05e17bb3b2d" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-11841" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-347" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-01T23:32:27Z", "nvd_published_at": "2019-05-22T17:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A message-forgery issue was discovered in `crypto/openpgp/clearsign/clearsign.go` in supplementary Go cryptography libraries 2019-03-25. According to the OpenPGP Message Format specification in RFC 4880 chapter 7, a cleartext signed message can contain one or more optional \"Hash\" Armor Headers. The \"Hash\" Armor Header specifies the message digest algorithm(s) used for the signature. However, the Go clearsign package ignores the value of this header, which allows an attacker to spoof it. Consequently, an attacker can lead a victim to believe the signature was generated using a different message digest algorithm than what was actually used. Moreover, since the library skips Armor Header parsing in general, an attacker can not only embed arbitrary Armor Headers, but also prepend arbitrary text to cleartext messages without invalidating the signatures.", "id": "GHSA-x3jr-pf6g-c48f", "modified": "2023-10-02T15:42:07Z", "published": "2022-05-24T16:46:15Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11841" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/c05e17bb3b2dca130fc919668a96b4bec9eb9442" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/golang/crypto/tree/master/openpgp/clearsign" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://go-review.git.corp.google.com/c/crypto/+/173778" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://go.googlesource.com/crypto/+/c05e17bb3b2dca130fc919668a96b4bec9eb9442" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-openpgp/6vdgZoTgbIY/K6bBY9z3DAAJ" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00011.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/10/msg00014.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00017.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2023-1992" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20201207161832/https://sec-consult.com/en/blog/advisories/cleartext-message-spoofing-in-go-cryptography-libraries-cve-2019-11841" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152840/Go-Cryptography-Libraries-Cleartext-Message-Spoofing.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Golang/x/crypto message forgery vulnerability" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.