ghsa-x9p3-334f-m7g8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-05 02:48
Modified
2025-04-12 12:34
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Isync 0.4 before 1.0.6, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-0289" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-05-23T14:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Isync 0.4 before 1.0.6, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.", "id": "GHSA-x9p3-334f-m7g8", "modified": "2025-04-12T12:34:03Z", "published": "2022-05-05T02:48:44Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-0289" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/82232" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-March/099544.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-March/099547.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/55190" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201310-02.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://sourceforge.net/p/isync/isync/ci/914ede18664980925628a9ed2a73ad05f85aeedb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://sourceforge.net/projects/isync/files/isync/1.0.6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/20/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57423" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…