ghsa-xgpw-j4x5-5gv2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:12
Modified
2022-05-17 05:12
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in res/res_format_attr_h264.c in Asterisk Open Source 11.x before 11.2.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long sprop-parameter-sets H.264 media attribute in a SIP Session Description Protocol (SDP) header.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-2685"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-04-01T16:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in res/res_format_attr_h264.c in Asterisk Open Source 11.x before 11.2.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long sprop-parameter-sets H.264 media attribute in a SIP Session Description Protocol (SDP) header.",
  "id": "GHSA-xgpw-j4x5-5gv2",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:12:26Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:12:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-2685"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20901"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2013-001.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…