ghsa-xm3c-w6gm-7q8v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. There is an Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability. OCSP responses have two time values: thisUpdate and nextUpdate. These specify a validity period; however, both values are optional. Crypto-J treats the lack of a nextUpdate as indicating that the OCSP response is valid indefinitely instead of restricting its validity for a brief period surrounding the thisUpdate time. This vulnerability is similar to the issue described in CVE-2015-4748.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-8212" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-404" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-02-03T07:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in EMC RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.2. There is an Improper OCSP Validation Vulnerability. OCSP responses have two time values: thisUpdate and nextUpdate. These specify a validity period; however, both values are optional. Crypto-J treats the lack of a nextUpdate as indicating that the OCSP response is valid indefinitely instead of restricting its validity for a brief period surrounding the thisUpdate time. This vulnerability is similar to the issue described in CVE-2015-4748.", "id": "GHSA-xm3c-w6gm-7q8v", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:38Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:04:38Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8212" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540066/30/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95831" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037732" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…