gsd-2004-2654
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:22
Details
The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference. NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor's bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2004-2654


To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2004-2654",
    "description": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference.  NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5.",
    "id": "GSD-2004-2654"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2004-2654"
      ],
      "details": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference.  NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5.",
      "id": "GSD-2004-2654",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:55.045613Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2004-2654",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference.  NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972"
          },
          {
            "name": "1011214",
            "refsource": "SECTRACK",
            "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011214"
          },
          {
            "name": "9801",
            "refsource": "OSVDB",
            "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/9801"
          },
          {
            "name": "20060223 old Squid clientAbortBody issue - NOT an overflow?",
            "refsource": "VIM",
            "url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-February/000570.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "12754",
            "refsource": "SECUNIA",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12754"
          },
          {
            "name": "12508",
            "refsource": "SECUNIA",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12508"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:squid:squid:2.5_stable5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2004-2654"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "The clientAbortBody function in client_side.c in Squid Web Proxy Cache before 2.6 STABLE6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via unspecified vectors that trigger a null dereference.  NOTE: in a followup advisory, a researcher claimed that the issue was a buffer overflow that was not fixed in STABLE6. However, the vendor\u0027s bug report clearly shows that the researcher later retracted this claim, because the tested product was actually STABLE5."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=972"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securitylab.ru/47881.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "20060223 old Squid clientAbortBody issue - NOT an overflow?",
              "refsource": "VIM",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-February/000570.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "9801",
              "refsource": "OSVDB",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/9801"
            },
            {
              "name": "1011214",
              "refsource": "SECTRACK",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011214"
            },
            {
              "name": "12508",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12508"
            },
            {
              "name": "12754",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12754"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2008-09-05T20:44Z",
      "publishedDate": "2004-12-31T05:00Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.