gsd-2006-3778
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) "Save As Draft" option is used or (2) a "," (comma) is inside the "phrase" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2006-3778",
"description": "IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \"Save As Draft\" option is used or (2) a \",\" (comma) is inside the \"phrase\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.",
"id": "GSD-2006-3778"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-3778"
],
"details": "IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \"Save As Draft\" option is used or (2) a \",\" (comma) is inside the \"phrase\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.",
"id": "GSD-2006-3778",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:57.355259Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2006-3778",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \"Save As Draft\" option is used or (2) a \",\" (comma) is inside the \"phrase\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "1016516",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516"
},
{
"name": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602"
},
{
"name": "1016819",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819"
},
{
"name": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386"
},
{
"name": "21096",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21096"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2006-3778"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \"Save As Draft\" option is used or (2) a \",\" (comma) is inside the \"phrase\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386"
},
{
"name": "1016516",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516"
},
{
"name": "21096",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21096"
},
{
"name": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602"
},
{
"name": "1016819",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2008-09-05T21:08Z",
"publishedDate": "2006-07-24T12:19Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…