gsd-2017-14604
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
GNOME Nautilus before 3.23.90 allows attackers to spoof a file type by using the .desktop file extension, as demonstrated by an attack in which a .desktop file's Name field ends in .pdf but this file's Exec field launches a malicious "sh -c" command. In other words, Nautilus provides no UI indication that a file actually has the potentially unsafe .desktop extension; instead, the UI only shows the .pdf extension. One (slightly) mitigating factor is that an attack requires the .desktop file to have execute permission. The solution is to ask the user to confirm that the file is supposed to be treated as a .desktop file, and then remember the user's answer in the metadata::trusted field.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2017-14604",
"description": "GNOME Nautilus before 3.23.90 allows attackers to spoof a file type by using the .desktop file extension, as demonstrated by an attack in which a .desktop file\u0027s Name field ends in .pdf but this file\u0027s Exec field launches a malicious \"sh -c\" command. In other words, Nautilus provides no UI indication that a file actually has the potentially unsafe .desktop extension; instead, the UI only shows the .pdf extension. One (slightly) mitigating factor is that an attack requires the .desktop file to have execute permission. The solution is to ask the user to confirm that the file is supposed to be treated as a .desktop file, and then remember the user\u0027s answer in the metadata::trusted field.",
"id": "GSD-2017-14604",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14604.html",
"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3994",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0223",
"https://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2017-14604.html"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-14604"
],
"details": "GNOME Nautilus before 3.23.90 allows attackers to spoof a file type by using the .desktop file extension, as demonstrated by an attack in which a .desktop file\u0027s Name field ends in .pdf but this file\u0027s Exec field launches a malicious \"sh -c\" command. In other words, Nautilus provides no UI indication that a file actually has the potentially unsafe .desktop extension; instead, the UI only shows the .pdf extension. One (slightly) mitigating factor is that an attack requires the .desktop file to have execute permission. The solution is to ask the user to confirm that the file is supposed to be treated as a .desktop file, and then remember the user\u0027s answer in the metadata::trusted field.",
"id": "GSD-2017-14604",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:12.678336Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-14604",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "GNOME Nautilus before 3.23.90 allows attackers to spoof a file type by using the .desktop file extension, as demonstrated by an attack in which a .desktop file\u0027s Name field ends in .pdf but this file\u0027s Exec field launches a malicious \"sh -c\" command. In other words, Nautilus provides no UI indication that a file actually has the potentially unsafe .desktop extension; instead, the UI only shows the .pdf extension. One (slightly) mitigating factor is that an attack requires the .desktop file to have execute permission. The solution is to ask the user to confirm that the file is supposed to be treated as a .desktop file, and then remember the user\u0027s answer in the metadata::trusted field."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop/issues/2238",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop/issues/2238"
},
{
"name": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860268",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860268"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/commit/1630f53481f445ada0a455e9979236d31a8d3bb0",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/commit/1630f53481f445ada0a455e9979236d31a8d3bb0"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777991",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777991"
},
{
"name": "101012",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101012"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3994",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3994"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/commit/bc919205bf774f6af3fa7154506c46039af5a69b",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/commit/bc919205bf774f6af3fa7154506c46039af5a69b"
},
{
"name": "https://micahflee.com/2017/04/breaking-the-security-model-of-subgraph-os/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://micahflee.com/2017/04/breaking-the-security-model-of-subgraph-os/"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2018:0223",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0223"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:gnome:nautilus:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "3.23.90",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-14604"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GNOME Nautilus before 3.23.90 allows attackers to spoof a file type by using the .desktop file extension, as demonstrated by an attack in which a .desktop file\u0027s Name field ends in .pdf but this file\u0027s Exec field launches a malicious \"sh -c\" command. In other words, Nautilus provides no UI indication that a file actually has the potentially unsafe .desktop extension; instead, the UI only shows the .pdf extension. One (slightly) mitigating factor is that an attack requires the .desktop file to have execute permission. The solution is to ask the user to confirm that the file is supposed to be treated as a .desktop file, and then remember the user\u0027s answer in the metadata::trusted field."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://micahflee.com/2017/04/breaking-the-security-model-of-subgraph-os/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://micahflee.com/2017/04/breaking-the-security-model-of-subgraph-os/"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/commit/bc919205bf774f6af3fa7154506c46039af5a69b",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/commit/bc919205bf774f6af3fa7154506c46039af5a69b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/commit/1630f53481f445ada0a455e9979236d31a8d3bb0",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/commit/1630f53481f445ada0a455e9979236d31a8d3bb0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop/issues/2238",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop/issues/2238"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777991",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777991"
},
{
"name": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860268",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860268"
},
{
"name": "101012",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101012"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3994",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3994"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2018:0223",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0223"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2020-08-18T15:05Z",
"publishedDate": "2017-09-20T08:29Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…