gsd-2022-31170
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2022-31170",
"description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
"id": "GSD-2022-31170"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-31170"
],
"details": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
"id": "GSD-2022-31170",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:17.816733Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-31170",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": " OpenZeppelin Contracts\u0027s ERC165Checker may revert instead of returning false"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "openzeppelin-contracts",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.1"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "OpenZeppelin"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
},
"gitlab.com": {
"advisories": [
{
"affected_range": "\u003e=4.0.0 \u003c4.7.1",
"affected_versions": "All versions starting from 4.0.0 before 4.7.1",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-20",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2022-07-21",
"description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 is vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that does not implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
"fixed_versions": [
"4.7.1"
],
"identifier": "CVE-2022-31170",
"identifiers": [
"GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"CVE-2022-31170"
],
"not_impacted": "All versions before 4.0.0, all versions starting from 4.7.1",
"package_slug": "npm/@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable",
"pubdate": "2022-07-21",
"solution": "Upgrade to version 4.7.1 or above.",
"title": "Improper Input Validation",
"urls": [
"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
],
"uuid": "2cc01cf5-ed15-485d-8b82-8134e2153b6b"
},
{
"affected_range": "\u003e=4.0.0 \u003c4.7.1",
"affected_versions": "All versions starting from 4.0.0 before 4.7.1",
"cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-252",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2022-08-01",
"description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 is vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that does not implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
"fixed_versions": [
"4.7.1"
],
"identifier": "CVE-2022-31170",
"identifiers": [
"CVE-2022-31170",
"GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
],
"not_impacted": "All versions before 4.0.0, all versions starting from 4.7.1",
"package_slug": "npm/@openzeppelin/contracts",
"pubdate": "2022-07-22",
"solution": "Upgrade to version 4.7.1 or above.",
"title": "Improper Input Validation",
"urls": [
"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
],
"uuid": "2fbdc191-e99c-412f-bd0f-1531b418d051"
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:openzeppelin:contracts:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "4.7.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-31170"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-252"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2022-08-01T15:50Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-07-22T04:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…