gsd-2024-28836
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-04-02 05:02
Details
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.5.x before 3.6.0. When negotiating the TLS version on the server side, it can fall back to the TLS 1.2 implementation of the protocol if it is disabled. If the TLS 1.2 implementation was disabled at build time, a TLS 1.2 client could put a TLS 1.3-only server into an infinite loop processing a TLS 1.2 ClientHello, resulting in a denial of service. If the TLS 1.2 implementation was disabled at runtime, a TLS 1.2 client can successfully establish a TLS 1.2 connection with the server.
Aliases



{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2024-28836"
      ],
      "details": "An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.5.x before 3.6.0. When negotiating the TLS version on the server side, it can fall back to the TLS 1.2 implementation of the protocol if it is disabled. If the TLS 1.2 implementation was disabled at build time, a TLS 1.2 client could put a TLS 1.3-only server into an infinite loop processing a TLS 1.2 ClientHello, resulting in a denial of service. If the TLS 1.2 implementation was disabled at runtime, a TLS 1.2 client can successfully establish a TLS 1.2 connection with the server.",
      "id": "GSD-2024-28836",
      "modified": "2024-04-02T05:02:55.526591Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2024-28836",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.5.x before 3.6.0. When negotiating the TLS version on the server side, it can fall back to the TLS 1.2 implementation of the protocol if it is disabled. If the TLS 1.2 implementation was disabled at build time, a TLS 1.2 client could put a TLS 1.3-only server into an infinite loop processing a TLS 1.2 ClientHello, resulting in a denial of service. If the TLS 1.2 implementation was disabled at runtime, a TLS 1.2 client can successfully establish a TLS 1.2 connection with the server."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tech-updates/security-advisories/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tech-updates/security-advisories/"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/tag/v3.6.0",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/tag/v3.6.0"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.5.x before 3.6.0. When negotiating the TLS version on the server side, it can fall back to the TLS 1.2 implementation of the protocol if it is disabled. If the TLS 1.2 implementation was disabled at build time, a TLS 1.2 client could put a TLS 1.3-only server into an infinite loop processing a TLS 1.2 ClientHello, resulting in a denial of service. If the TLS 1.2 implementation was disabled at runtime, a TLS 1.2 client can successfully establish a TLS 1.2 connection with the server."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en Mbed TLS 3.5.x anterior a 3.6.0. Al negociar la versi\u00f3n TLS en el lado del servidor, puede recurrir a la implementaci\u00f3n TLS 1.2 del protocolo si est\u00e1 deshabilitada. Si la implementaci\u00f3n de TLS 1.2 se deshabilit\u00f3 en el momento de la compilaci\u00f3n, un cliente TLS 1.2 podr\u00eda colocar un servidor exclusivo de TLS 1.3 en un bucle infinito procesando un ClientHello de TLS 1.2, lo que resultar\u00eda en una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. Si la implementaci\u00f3n de TLS 1.2 se deshabilit\u00f3 en tiempo de ejecuci\u00f3n, un cliente TLS 1.2 puede establecer exitosamente una conexi\u00f3n TLS 1.2 con el servidor."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-28836",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-03T12:38:04.840",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-04-03T03:15:10.350",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "url": "https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/tag/v3.6.0"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "url": "https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tech-updates/security-advisories/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…