pysec-2019-160
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2019-11-05 22:15
Modified
2021-07-15 02:22
Details
The mirroring support (-M, --use-mirrors) in Python Pip before 1.5 uses insecure DNS querying and authenticity checks which allows attackers to perform man-in-the-middle attacks.
Impacted products
Name | purl | pip | pkg:pypi/pip |
---|
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "pip", "purl": "pkg:pypi/pip" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.5" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "0.2", "0.2.1", "0.3", "0.3.1", "0.4", "0.5", "0.5.1", "0.6", "0.6.1", "0.6.2", "0.6.3", "0.7", "0.7.1", "0.7.2", "0.8", "0.8.1", "0.8.2", "0.8.3", "1.0", "1.0.1", "1.0.2", "1.1", "1.2", "1.2.1", "1.3", "1.3.1", "1.4", "1.4.1" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-5123", "GHSA-c5h8-cq4v-cvfm" ], "details": "The mirroring support (-M, --use-mirrors) in Python Pip before 1.5 uses insecure DNS querying and authenticity checks which allows attackers to perform man-in-the-middle attacks.", "id": "PYSEC-2019-160", "modified": "2021-07-15T02:22:17.687153Z", "published": "2019-11-05T22:15:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155248.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/08/21/18" }, { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-5123" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155291.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-5123" }, { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-5123" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/08/21/17" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77520" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-c5h8-cq4v-cvfm" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…